The Ups and Downs of Blogging

Information is power.

Thus less surprising are the buzz of information and the communication of it. My project here at Stanford is about information and how we can transfer that information from in-the-field to an information database. Initially the project is focused on an open-source news application to be used in emerging democracies. Very few people are reflecting on what this information is and for what purpose it exists? The question “Do we really need all this information?” emerges…

One of the main sources of information today is blogs. The creation of blogs has revolutioned the possibility for the individual to produce information and participate in debates. The question remains: If we are all producing information, who will read it? Who will have the time to read it?

Today there is a need to be constantly up to date of all the discussions. Of course not all information you find out on the web is relevant and you have to find a way to filter through this information noise. Yes, I label it as noise. Why? Look at this analogy. You are in a room with 50 other people. Usually you are only involved in one conversation and not all the conversations at the same time. Today the situation on the web is really like following all the conversations simultaneously, which clearly is a bit schizophrenic.

As more information is produced you will have to filter through it. Today the only available functional filter is really for you to choose which blogs (or feeds) you want to read. Nicholas Carr recently touched this area discussing how many RSS-feeds you can really read per day. He said in his blog The Mainstream Blogosphere: “Some people max out at 5 feeds, some at 50. I’ve even read some people claim they’re topping out at a truly nauseating 200. I currently have 27 feeds, and that’s way too many. I’ve gone from adding to pruning. Most of us will ultimately cut back to a handful of blogs that we read regularly, supplementing them with the odd post from here or there. That’s only natural.

I totally agree with him.

I have drastically cut down on my selection of blogs and is down below 10 feeds that I check each day. I therefore challenge the thought of everyone having their own blog. The idea of everyone having their voice in the debate is something that is very important, especially in emerging democracies. Group blogs are thus far much more interesting than everyone having their own little space in the cyber, as they also strengthen the community aspect of the blogs.

Blogs are great, but not everyone should have their own.

Social communities |

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

About Erik Sundelöf

  • Erik Sundelof is the Chief Technical Officer of Spot.Us. Erik was previously the co-founder and VP of Social Media and User Interface at San Francisco based Allvoices, Inc. Allvoices is a new content-based social network around news and opinions which currently is the biggest citizen news media site on the web. It became one of the 3000 largest sites on the Internet within 6 months of launch. Erik was previously a fellow in the Reuters Digital Vision Program (http://www.rdvp.org) at Stanford University between 2005-2006. Most notably he created the Web site inthefieldONLINE.net, which was recognized by major global media including PBS, CNN and BBC, and got featured on Discovery International's Rewind 2006 as one of 25 highlights of the Year. He is active in the social media arena and has directed the launch of several social media sites including the biggest blog in Sweden during 2005-2007. Erik is a prolific blogger on issues related to social and user-generated media, group dynamics, cellphone technology and community building. His academic orientations are rooted in a Master?s degree in Chemical Engineering and PhD licentiate in Numerical Analysis from the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.

Search

Navigation

Blog Topics

Monthly Archives

Link List